L-MOUNT Forum

Register a free account now!

If you are registered, you get access to the members only section, can participate in the buy & sell second hand forum and last but not least you can reserve your preferred username before someone else takes it.

Lumix 28–200mm f/4–7.1 Sample Images

I don’t think the dynamic range of the scene has any effect on image quality with the 28-200. I’ve never seen any sort of softness that seemed associated with scenes that have high dynamic range, nor with dark vs. bright comps.
[...] But in general I’ve found mine to be reliable, if soft wide-open.
When RuleofThirds mentioned this problem for the first time, I thought of misfocussing. Some weeks ago I took a picture that was unsharp at 1/100 sec. It was clearly my fault. But I went through my pictures and saw a few that were partly not razor sharp. It was also in the centre of a picture. All the pictures had in common that the difference in light is great with a sharp line between darker and lighter parts.

Last Friday I took some pictures again with my new lens. When I had processed them I was happy because they were razor sharp. But when I looked again I saw a colour shift in the picture. My rawconverter (ART) had problems processing this picture. I could solve it quite easily by using a different setting in reducing highlights. Some weeks ago I had trouble processing a picture taken with my Lumix 14-28mm. In the picture were deep black solar panels on a red tiled roof. The sun was really out. After I had processed my pictures the solar panels had a wide red fringe around them. The solution was a bit difficult to find. The rawconverter automatically removes purple fringing. When I changed the setting to off, the solar panels were black again.

Today's lenses are software controlled. Distortion, vignetting and CA will be corrected automatically and store it in the metadata of the RAW file. The rawconverter I use, can read this information in Leica DNG files, but not in Panasonic RW2 files. Therefore I still believe that the Lumix 28-200mm can go wrong. I have an excellent copy of this lens but it happens very very occasionally. When I look at these pictures in a normal way I won't notice this unsharpness. I can only see it when pixelpeeping at 100%.
 
I won't notice this unsharpness. I can only see it when pixelpeeping at 100%
And that’s the problem. You have to pixelpeep every shot while being there and at the same time 80% of the picture is ok, until you get home. A quick glance on the small back screen is not enough.

And that picture in Amsterdam was taken in June or so, and took it on vacation anyway and again 90%+ still came out very nice. So it is a stupid love-hate with this lens. And thinking about giving up on it.

I don’t need mega ultra sharp pictures, but I’m loosing my faith in this one. And it is hard cause I like it, and love a lot of picture taken with it. But: Trust arrives on foot and leaves on horseback.
 
Trust arrives on foot and leaves on horseback.
Love it, is that an old Dutch homily or something?

Anyway that's about where I am with the 28 to 200. I have lots of nice pictures with it, but enough poor ones that I hardly ever use it anymore.
 
Love it, is that an old Dutch homily or something?

Anyway that's about where I am with the 28 to 200. I have lots of nice pictures with it, but enough poor ones that I hardly ever use it anymore.
I think it has Dutch origin, but I wasn't sure and looked up the English version... :cool:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top