What's new
L-MOUNT Forum

Register a free account now!

If you are registered, you get access to the members only section, can participate in the buy & sell second hand forum and last but not least you can reserve your preferred username before someone else takes it.

Interactive L-Mount Lens Table

Nice table. Thanks. I think the TTArtisan list is this:

- 11mm f2.8 fisheye
- 50mm f1.4 tilt
- 500mm f6.3
- 50mm f2 pancake
- 100mm f2.8 macro
- 35mm T2.1 cine lens
- 50mm f1.4
- 90mm f1.5
- 75mm f2 AF
- 100mm f2.8 T/S

They used to do a 21mm f1.5 but it's now discontinued.
 
Last edited:
No time yet to add the TTArtisan lenses but I have added a view interactive charts: https://www.endlesslycurious.net/posts/lens-charts/

You can explore the following:

Charts are interactive, so you can filter, zoom, etc.

If anyone has good ideas for a different type of visualization based on the lens data, just let me know :)

Example screenshot:

Screenshot 2025-08-05 at 22.12.36.png
 
Someone commented that the Panasonic 18mm 1.8 is categorized as Wide Angle rather than UWA. I think it is a matter of definition; I would consider it UWA, but mileage varies.
And thanks for the continuing refinements!
 
Never really noticed that Panasonic’s lens distribution overall skews slightly cheaper than Sigma. I guess it just pushes to show that they have not done any “Pro” glass for quite a while. Will be interesting to see if this will get rectified or if they leave the more expensive segments to Sigma and Leica. Would be odd since I would naively guess that those lenses have higher margins?


IMG_0112.jpeg
 
pdk42 said:
Nice table. Thanks. I think the TTArtisan list is this:

- 11mm f2.8 fisheye
- 50mm f1.4 tilt
- 500mm f6.3
- 50mm f2 pancake
- 100mm f2.8 macro
- 35mm T2.1 cine lens
- 50mm f1.4
- 90mm f1.5
- 75mm f2 AF
- 100mm f2.8 T/S

They used to do a 21mm f1.5 but it's now discontinued.
Click to expand...
All added now
 
Jan.Wedekind said:
Never really noticed that Panasonic’s lens distribution overall skews slightly cheaper than Sigma. I guess it just pushes to show that they have not done any “Pro” glass for quite a while. Will be interesting to see if this will get rectified or if they leave the more expensive segments to Sigma and Leica. Would be odd since I would naively guess that those lenses have higher margins?


View attachment 14082
Click to expand...
Interesting comparison. I'm actually a big fan of Lumix lenses. Setting aside some poor experiences with copy variation, I find their performance to be more than adequate and the prices are reasonable. In fact, apart from the 28-200 (which even after trying three copies I still found to be underwhelming), there isn't a Lumix lens that isn't a great performer - whether Pro or not.
 
pdk42 said:
Great. This is a great resource you've built.

Small editing suggestion - TTArtisan is not plural. But you've used "TTArtisans" in the selection criteria.
Click to expand...
Ooooooh so well spotted! Fixed. It drove me nuts all the time because it is 7Artisans with plural and TTartisan without s….
pdk42 said:
Interesting comparison. I'm actually a big fan of Lumix lenses. Setting aside some poor experiences with copy variation, I find their performance to be more than adequate and the prices are reasonable. In fact, apart from the 28-200 (which even after trying three copies I still found to be underwhelming), there isn't a Lumix lens that isn't a great performer - whether Pro or not.
Click to expand...
Yes I have similar feelings. I also find that I often like the rendering and colors more. The 28-200 is actually fine for me. Also prefer often the 50mm Panasonic over the Sigma 35f2. The latter is definitely sharper but I find the image from the Pana often more pleasing. Probably just anchoring
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top